You have native languages that can be verified You can request verification for native languages by completing a simple application that takes only a couple of minutes. See the guidelines for formulating a request for a statement. Home Clinical radiology Specialty training Radiology Curriculum. The person responsible for the making the decision is the rector of the university, or if the university so decides, the chancellor, or the rector of a university of applied sciences, or the director of the research organisation. Automatic update in
This notification must specify the type of the alleged violation of responsible conduct of research, as well as the grounds for the allegation. Post Your ideas for ProZ. The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK , appointed by the Ministry of Education and Culture, promotes the responsible conduct of research, prevents research misconduct, promotes discussion and spreads information on research integrity in Finland. Robert Copeland KudoZ activity Questions: If a decision is made to conduct the preliminary inquiry, the instigator of the allegation, the person alleged of misconduct and the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity must be notified immediately of the inquiry and of the grounds for it.
The person requesting the statement is to be given an opportunity to comment on these responses. View forum View forum without registering on UserVoice.
The guidelines apply to investigations into the alleged violations of the responsible conduct of research. Term search All of ProZ. Peer comments on this answer and responses from the answerer agree. Spanish term or phrase: This higher training will focus on either vascular or non-vascular IR, or a dcr of both, or diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology.
If the approval of the thesis is pending, or the candidate has not yet been granted permission to defend the thesis, the institution can investigate the allegations by following an internal procedure, unless the researcher suspected of a RCR violation insists on an investigation according to these guidelines.
Investigation of misconduct in Finland | TENK
The effectiveness of these guidelines is based on a voluntary commitment by the research community to adhere to them, and to increase awareness of the principles of research integrity. The allegation of a violation of the responsible conduct of research must be communicated in writing to the rector or to another decision-maker in a similar position hereafter the rector.
If those alleged of misconduct have worked in several research communities, the handling of the alleged misconduct requires cooperation between the respective organisations, which are to agree amongst themselves as to how to conduct the investigation. For the investigation proper, the rector will establish an investigation committee and rccr the expert members to join, one of whom will be appointed as chair of the committee.
The parties concerned and the Advisory Board on Research Integrity must be notified about the initiation of the investigation proper. The Advisory Board rcrr not conduct the preliminary inquiry or the investigation proper and it does not arrange hearings.
Automatic update in The investigations into alleged RCR violations do not handle vitad that are related to criminal law, immaterial rights or labour law, or into other legal issues that may be related to the alleged violation.
Review native language verification applications submitted by your peers. Furthermore, the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity can also recommend an investigation if it has reason to suspect misconduct within the organisation in question.
This report needs to contain:.
If a decision is made to conduct the preliminary inquiry, the instigator of the allegation, the person alleged of misconduct and the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity must be notified immediately of the inquiry and of the grounds for it.
This decision may also be made public if so requested by the person alleged of misconduct or if the publishing of it is otherwise deemed necessary. The curriculum review and rewrite page contains information on this process and will be updated as work progresses.
See Finnish page Sitoutuneet organisaatiot. The investigation needs to be conducted with expediency. An account of the events prior to establishing the investigation committee, such as an account of the research or the activities alleged to represent misconduct, as well as the evidence for the allegation.
This request must be justified and it must address the specific questions that are the basis for the statement requested. An account of the events prior to establishing the investigation committee, such as an account of the research or the activities alleged to represent misconduct, as well as the evidence for the allegation b.
A written notification A preliminary inquiry The investigation proper The most crucial factors ensuring the fairness of the procedure to all parties are: The person responsible for the making the decision is the rector of the university, or if the university so decides, the chancellor, or the rector of a university of applied sciences, or the director of the research organisation. Patents, Trademarks, Copyright Law: Login or register free and only takes a few minutes to participate in this question.
It is in the mutual interests of society, the research community, and the researchers, to resolve all allegations of research misconduct.
The Rector will decide on whether or not a violation of the responsible conduct of research has occurred. If after the preliminary inquiry, there is still reason to suspect disregard of the responsible conduct of research or research misconduct, the rector must initiate the investigation proper. Dr Sue Levy X: